Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/304474 
Year of Publication: 
2001
Citation: 
[Journal:] Agrarwirtschaft: Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, Marktforschung und Agrarpolitik [ISSN:] 0002-1121 [Volume:] 50 [Issue:] 3 [Year:] 2001 [Pages:] 153-157
Publisher: 
Deutscher Fachverlag, Frankfurt a. M.
Abstract (Translated): 
The decision of the WTO dispute settlement in the hormone dispute between the EC and the USA - implications for further handling of the SPS-agreement Institutions should reduce uncertainty and the costs of transaction with their regulating activities. This target was pursued at an international level with the foundation of the WTO. With an extensive treaty and a new dispute settlement procedure, the WTO was founded as the institutional platform for international co-operation. In view of the growing conflicts in international trade, the hope to create with this institution an international trade order, in which legally comprehensible decisions dominate and power-oriented politics are deterred, is fading. The case of the hormone dispute shows that the target of a fast harmonization of international standards cannot be reached in critical trade disputes. A solo effort in the area of trade measures that is introduced with the reason to protect consumers is still possible.
Subjects: 
Internationale Handelspolitik
Fleischmarkt
EU-Staaten
USA
Hormon
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Document Type: 
Article

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.