Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/304382.2 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2025
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
GLO Discussion Paper No. 1505 [rev.]
Versionsangabe: 
Revised Version: October 9, 2025
Verlag: 
Global Labor Organization (GLO), Essen
Zusammenfassung: 
This paper experimentally examines Max Weber's thesis on the influence of religious narratives - particularly the Protestant Ethic - on attitudes toward wealth redistribution. Weber argued that the Protestant Reformation fostered the belief that economic success signals divine favour, thereby legitimising wealth inequality. We test this idea using a variation of the dictator game, leveraging a religious narrative that casts the dictator's role - and the endowment of wealth - as a divine blessing. By exogenously evoking the blessingof- wealth narrative to different religious groups, we then examine how subjects' redistribution behaviour is affected. Our findings reveal that low-income Protestants exposed to the blessing narrative are significantly less inclined to redistribute wealth than their Catholic counterparts, consistent with Weber's claim that Protestantism can serve to rationalise inequality through the lens of divine providence. A complementary narrative analysis further reveals that Protestants, Calvinists, Methodists, and Atheists tend to interpret blessings as a sign of divine election that is contingent upon wealth. In contrast, Catholics more often associate them with spiritual meanings alone. These results underscore the decisive role of religious narratives in shaping economic preferences, providing empirical support for Weber's enduring thesis.
Schlagwörter: 
experimental economics
Max Weber
religious narratives
pro-social behaviour
redistribution
JEL: 
J14
J15
Z12
Z1
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
225.36 kB




Versionsverlauf
Version Dokument Versionsbeschreibung
2 10419/304382.2 Revised Version: October 9, 2025
1 10419/304382 First Version: October 15, 2024

Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.