Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/302118 
Autor:innen: 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2024
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
SWP Comment No. 32/2024
Verlag: 
Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik (SWP), Berlin
Zusammenfassung: 
Ethiopia has long been in a period of upheaval characterised by massive levels of violence. Relations between the largest ethnic groups are in flux, as is their relationship with the government. The state lacks legitimacy in the central regions of the country, its monopoly on the use of force is contested, and it does not have enough financial resources to provide for the population on a nationwide scale. The national dialogue is intended to facilitate Ethiopia's transformation and increase support for the state among the population. However, the conditions for a confidence-building dialogue are not in place, given the armed uprisings in the two most populous states of Amhara and Oromia; the severely restricted independence of the media and freedom of expression; and the dominance of the ruling party in parliament and society. An additional structured dialogue at the level of the most important political players could mitigate one of the main weaknesses of the process. International actors who, like Germany, support the national dialogue should be careful not to allow themselves to be used for authoritarian consolidation.
Schlagwörter: 
peacebuilding
transitional justice
Ethiopian National Dialogue Commission
ENDC
Abiy Ahmed
Amhara
Tigray
Oromia
Oromo
Tigray People's Liberation Front
TPLF
Fano rebels
Multi-stakeholder Initiative for National Dialogue
Prosperity Party
Joint Council of Political Parties
Oromo Liberation Front
Oromo Federalist Congress
Oromo Liberation Army
OLA
Ethiopia Peace Observatory
Persistent Identifier der Erstveröffentlichung: 
Creative-Commons-Lizenz: 
cc-by Logo
Dokumentart: 
Research Report

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
210.77 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.