Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/29912
Autor:innen: 
Frondel, Manuel
Ritter, Nolan
Schmidt, Christoph M.
Vance, Colin
Datum: 
2009
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
Ruhr Economic Papers No. 156
Verlag: 
Rheinisch-Westfälisches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (RWI), Essen
Zusammenfassung: 
The allure of an environmentally benign, abundant, and cost-effective energy source has led an increasing number of industrialized countries to back public financing of renewable energies. Germany's experience with renewable energy promotion is often cited as a model to be replicated elsewhere, being based on a combination of far-reaching energy and environmental laws that stretch back nearly two decades. This paper critically reviews the current centerpiece of this effort, the Renewable Energy Sources Act (EEG), focusing on its costs and the associated implications for job creation and climate protection. We argue that German renewable energy policy, and in particular the adopted feed-in tariff scheme, has failed to harness the market incentives needed to ensure a viable and cost-effective introduction of renewable energies into the country's energy portfolio. To the contrary, the government's support mechanisms have in many respects subverted these incentives, resulting in massive expenditures that show little long-term promise for stimulating the economy, protecting the environment, or increasing energy security.
Schlagwörter: 
Energy policy
energy security
climate
employment
JEL: 
Q28
Q42
Q48
ISBN: 
978-3-86788-173-9
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
542.75 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.