Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/28786
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSchmidt, Ulrichen_US
dc.contributor.authorTraub, Stefanen_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-12-11T15:11:57Z-
dc.date.available2009-12-11T15:11:57Z-
dc.date.issued2009en_US
dc.identifier.citation|aTheory and Decision |c0040-5833 |nSpringer |lHeidelberg |v66 |h3 |p229-262en_US
dc.identifier.pidoi:10.1007/s11238-007-9062-2en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/28786-
dc.description.abstractIn this paper we experimentally investigate the disparity between willingness-to-accept (WTA) and willingness-to-pay (WTP) for risky lotteries. The direction of the income effect is reversed by endowing subjects with the highest price of a lottery when asking the WTP question. Our results show that the income effect is too small to be the only source of the disparity. Since the disparity concentrates on a subsample of subjects, parametric and nonparametric tests of the WTA-WTP ratio may lead to contradictory results. The disparity is significantly reduced when background risk is introduced. That is, putting subjects always into a risky position could improve the contingent valuation method, which is often concerned with the assessment of risky situations such as health risks, automobile safety, etc.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisher|aZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften, Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft |cKiel, Hamburg-
dc.subject.jelC91en_US
dc.subject.jelD81en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordWTA-WTP disparityen_US
dc.subject.keywordlotteriesen_US
dc.subject.keywordbackground risken_US
dc.subject.keywordcontingent valuationen_US
dc.titleAn experimental investigation of the disparity between WTA and WTP for lotteriesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen-
dc.identifier.repecRePEc:zbw:ifwkie:28786-
dc.identifier.printppn592397769en_US

Files in This Item:
File
Size
232.25 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.