Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/28542
Authors: 
Neuhäusler, Peter
Year of Publication: 
2009
Series/Report no.: 
Fraunhofer ISI discussion papers innovation systems and policy analysis 20
Abstract: 
The present article examines the question whether or not different types of firms tend to protect their innovations with varying mechanisms. Against the background of the Expected-Utility Theory (EU-Theory), firms are differentiated by their size, technological field and their degree of internationalization. According to the EU-Theory modelling, it is hypothesized that large, high-tech and strongly internationalized firms show a stronger tendency to use formal instruments, e.g. patents, to protect their innovations, whereas small and medium-sized (SME), low-tech and weakly internationalized companies fol-low the strategy of protecting their innovations with informal instruments, e.g. secrecy, to maximize their expected utility. A twofold approach is followed to analyze the theoretical model. For the empirical testing a large-scale survey about 540 records of patenting companies in Germany is used. Differences in attitudes towards protection mechanisms and differences in the actual IPR-management behavior between firms are analyzed. The results show that the attitudes towards protecting innovative achievements only differ slightly by firm type. Large differences can be revealed on the behavioral level which, together with other findings, leads to the conclusion that mostly SMEs are forced to use certain protection mechanisms to keep pace with large companies and technological precursors in fast growing markets.
Subjects: 
patents
secrecy
expected utility
Intellectual property
rational choice
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
633.19 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.