Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/284347 
Year of Publication: 
2023
Citation: 
[Journal:] European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention (EJEEP) [ISSN:] 2052-7772 [Volume:] 20 [Issue:] 3 [Year:] 2023 [Pages:] 539-560
Publisher: 
Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham
Abstract: 
This paper aims to contribute to the literature on growth regimes by combining an operationalization of growth regimes based on growth contributions and sectoral financial balances with an analysis of dominant social blocs (DSBs). We propose the concept of a growth strategy to bridge the political and actor-oriented sphere with the macroeconomic sphere. We employ this framework to analyze the cases of Poland and Turkey. The study identifies a transition from a domestic demand-led regime to a weakly export-led regime in Poland, while Turkey experienced a shift from a domestic demand-led regime to a debt-led private demand regime and subsequently towards a weakly export-led regime, too. Both countries' new DSBs pursue export-led growth strategies, but Poland's strategy focuses on non-price competitiveness while Turkey relies on price competitiveness. We lay out the differences between the strategies in terms of policies and the capital fractions supporting them.
Subjects: 
post-Keynesian macroeconomics
comparative political economy
growth regimes
growth strategies
Poland
Turkey
JEL: 
B52
E65
E66
F43
O43
P16
P52
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Creative Commons License: 
cc-by Logo
Document Type: 
Article

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.