Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/284343 
Autor:innen: 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2023
Quellenangabe: 
[Journal:] European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention (EJEEP) [ISSN:] 2052-7772 [Volume:] 20 [Issue:] 3 [Year:] 2023 [Pages:] 444-460
Verlag: 
Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham
Zusammenfassung: 
Recent contributions in comparative political economy have made much of the 'growth model perspective', presenting it as a way to 'rethink political economy'. This paper argues that the origins of the growth model approach can be found in contributions made by Michel Freyssenet in the framework of Gerpisa in the 1990s/2000. By presenting the contributions and limitations of Freyssenet's approach, it is possible to establish how contemporary growth model approaches fail to establish a solid link between political economy and heterodox macroeconomics. It appears that an approach that starts from the differentiation of interests of social groups and considers the autonomy of politics has more potential to achieve this task, allowing to recover the inspiration of article on the political limits to economic policy.
Schlagwörter: 
French Theory of Régulation
growth models
growth model perspective
accumulation regimes
political economy
JEL: 
B52
P10
Persistent Identifier der Erstveröffentlichung: 
Creative-Commons-Lizenz: 
cc-by Logo
Dokumentart: 
Article

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.