Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/284222 
Year of Publication: 
2022
Series/Report no.: 
IFS Working Papers No. 22/52
Publisher: 
Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), London
Abstract: 
We use a lab-in-the-field experiment to explore the influence of parents and peers in shaping adolescents' beliefs on whether they are better in male-typed fields (math) versus female-typed fields (literature). We find that thinking about parental recommendation affects students' beliefs on their comparative advantage in math with respect to literature in a gender-stereotypical way: conditional on ability, girls are 33% more likely to think they are better in literature when they expect their mothers to recommend it, and boys are 15% more likely to think they are better in math when they expect their fathers to recommend it. Our results also show that while peers do not influence boys' beliefs on their comparative advantage, girls are less confident in their relative ability in math compared to literature when they must interact with male students in areas outside their gender's domain.
Subjects: 
gender stereotypes
parents
peers
comparative advantage
math
literature
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.