Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/283749 
Year of Publication: 
2023
Series/Report no.: 
WIDER Working Paper No. 2023/53
Publisher: 
The United Nations University World Institute for Development Economics Research (UNU-WIDER), Helsinki
Abstract: 
The principle of inclusive development lies at the heart of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), and in particular Goal 16, with its focus on inclusive societies backed by inclusive institutions. Yet despite its ubiquity across the SDGs, inclusivity not only remains ill-defined, but is both controversial and deeply political across many UN member states. This is particularly so in fragile and conflict-affected states (FCAS), where the idea of sharing power more broadly (as one key element of what inclusivity implies) may be accepted in principle by elite-level actors but is rarely embraced in practice. In more extreme cases-South Sudan and Haiti among them- political power structures are dominated by elites determined to keep politics, through violence if necessary, as exclusive as possible. Within this wider context, in this paper we reflect on the challenges of operationalizing inclusivity and consider the strategies and policies through which development actors are navigating the dilemmas of operationalizing inclusivity in FCAS contexts. Drawing in part on evidence presented in draft chapters for a forthcoming volume on SDG 16 co-edited by the authors, we suggest that absent a consistent focus on inclusivity practices, the inclusivity principle risks becoming yet another underperforming buzzword in the development lexicon.
Subjects: 
Sustainable Development Goals
inclusion
peacebuilding
fragile and conflictaffected states
practice turn
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
ISBN: 
978-92-9267-361-1
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
348.95 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.