Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/282649 
Year of Publication: 
2023
Series/Report no.: 
IZA Discussion Papers No. 16522
Publisher: 
Institute of Labor Economics (IZA), Bonn
Abstract: 
Worker sorting into tasks and occupations has long been recognized as an important feature of labor markets. But this sorting may be inefficient if jobseekers have inaccurate beliefs about their skills and therefore apply to jobs that do not match their skills. To test this idea, we measure young South African jobseekers' communication and numeracy skills and their beliefs about their skill levels. Many jobseekers believe they are better at the skill in which they score lower, relative to other jobseekers. These beliefs predict the skill requirements of jobs where they apply. In two field experiments, giving jobseekers their skill assessment results shifts their beliefs toward their assessment results. It also redirects their search toward jobs that value the skill in which they score relatively higher – using measures from administrative, incentivized task, and survey data – but does not increase total search effort. It also raises earnings and job quality, consistent with inefficient sorting due to limited information.
Subjects: 
search frictions
information frictions
occupational choice
JEL: 
J22
J24
J31
J64
O15
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
1.99 MB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.