Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/282580 
Year of Publication: 
2023
Series/Report no.: 
IZA Discussion Papers No. 16453
Publisher: 
Institute of Labor Economics (IZA), Bonn
Abstract: 
We use admission lotteries for higher education studies in the Netherlands to investigate whether someone's field of study influences the study choices of their younger peers. We find that younger siblings and cousins are strongly affected. Also younger neighbors are affected but to a smaller extent. These findings indicate that a substantial part of the correlations in study choices between family members can be attributed to spillover effects and are not due to shared environments. Our findings contrast with those of recent studies based on admission thresholds, which find no sibling spillovers on field of study (major) choices. Because we also find spillovers from lottery participants at the lower end of the ability distribution, the contrasting findings cannot be attributed to the different research designs (leveraging admission lotteries versus admission thresholds). We believe that the different findings are due to the small differences in quality between universities in the Netherlands, making differences in the prestige of fields of study more prominent.
Subjects: 
major choice
higher education
peer effects
admission lotteries
JEL: 
I23
I24
J10
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
547.12 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.