Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/282162 
Year of Publication: 
2023
Series/Report no.: 
Discussion Paper No. 471
Publisher: 
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München und Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Collaborative Research Center Transregio 190 - Rationality and Competition, München und Berlin
Abstract: 
Traditionally, economic models have attributed procrastination to present bias. However, procrastination may also arise when individuals derive anticipatory utility from holding motivated, overly optimistic beliefs about the workload they need to complete. This study provides a rigorous empirical test for this notion of `motivated procrastination'. In a longitudinal experiment over four weeks, individuals have to complete a cumbersome task of unknown length. They are exposed to exogenous variation in i) their expectation regarding their workload and ii) scope for motivated reasoning. We find that scope for motivated reasoning allows workers to hold substantially more optimistic beliefs and identify a causal link between the exogenous variation in beliefs and the deferral of work to the future. This systematic belief-based delay of work (motivated procrastination) turns out to be robust to accounting for decision-makers' time preferences and emotional responses, and looms largest for decision makers who tend to not acquire information that may include negative news.
Subjects: 
anticipatory utility
beliefs
memory
motivated cognition
procrastination
real effort
task allocation
JEL: 
C91
D83
D84
D90
D91
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
776.7 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.