Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/282051 
Year of Publication: 
2022
Series/Report no.: 
Discussion Paper No. 359
Publisher: 
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München und Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Collaborative Research Center Transregio 190 - Rationality and Competition, München und Berlin
Abstract: 
Perceived urgency and regret are common in many sequential search processes; for example, sellers often pressure buyers in search of the best offer, both time-wise and in terms of potential regret of forgoing unique purchasing opportunities. theoretically, these strategies result in anticipated and experienced regret, which systematically affect search behavior and thereby distort optimal search. In addition, urgency may alter decision-making processes and thereby the salience of regret. To understand the empirical relevance of these aspects, we study the causal effects of regret, urgency, and their interaction on search behavior in a pre-registered, theory-based, and well-powered experiment. Empirically, we and that anticipated regret does not affect search behavior either with or without time pressure, while experienced regret leads to systematic adjustments in search length. Urgency reduces decision times and perceived decision quality, but does not generally alter search length. Only very inexperienced decision-makers buy earlier when pressured. Thus, consumer protection measures against pressure selling tactics can help inexperienced consumers in particular.
Subjects: 
sequential search
time pressure
regret
anticipated regret
experienced regret
JEL: 
C91
D01
D03
D18
D83
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
2.29 MB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.