Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/281674 
Year of Publication: 
2024
Citation: 
[Journal:] Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions [ISSN:] 2210-4232 [Volume:] 50 [Article No.:] 100814 [Publisher:] Elsevier [Place:] Amsterdam [Year:] 2024 [Pages:] --
Publisher: 
Elsevier, Amsterdam
Abstract: 
Radical innovations aiming for sustainability usually need to transform existing institutions in order to become successful. From a transition perspective, institutional work is one of the actors’ core activities in order to influence the dominant regime. This paper explores how institutional work materialises in an emerging bioeconomy. Our conceptual model shows how an industry's field conditions, combined with the actors’ characteristics, shape the pattern of institutional work. We propose a set of categories for the classification of institutional fields and differentiate three forms of institutional work. Empirical evidence on actor characteristics and institutional work originates from the bioeconomy segments of the chemical, plastic and construction materials industries. Our findings lead to a new field typology: the impact on actors’ institutional work can be conducive, barricading or exhausting. We recommend to question traditional actor classifications and formulate field specific policy measures for an emerging bioeconomy.
Subjects: 
bioeconomy
sustainability transition
neoinstitutional theory
institutional work
institutional fields
value chains
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Creative Commons License: 
cc-by Logo
Document Type: 
Article
Document Version: 
Published Version

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.