Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/28028
Authors: 
Bönke, Timm
de Haan, Jakob
Year of Publication: 
2006
Series/Report no.: 
Diskussionsbeiträge des Fachbereichs Wirtschaftswissenschaft der Freien Universität Berlin 2006/3
Abstract: 
We employ a rich sample of individual tax returns data to simulate alternatives to the income tax reform introduced in Germany by the governmental coalition of Social Democrats and Greens in 1998. We characterize three reforms that would have been fiscally equivalent to the actual one: a distributionally neutral tax reform, one with a maximal basic allowance, and a flat tax. By comparing the individual tax burdens under each alternative, we simulate majority voting on the tax reform. The actual reform loses against both the distributionally neutral reform and the one with maximal basic allowance; however, it wins against the flat tax. The Condorcet winner turns out to be the reform with maximal basic allowance.
ISBN: 
3938369299
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
389.99 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.