Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/2801
Authors: 
Orszag, Jonathan Michael
Snower, Dennis J.
Year of Publication: 
2002
Series/Report no.: 
IZA Discussion paper series 532
Abstract: 
We explore the implications of replacing current unemployment benefit (UB) systems by unemployment accounts (UA). Under the UA system, employed people would be required to make ongoing contributions to their unemployment accounts, and the balances in these accounts would then be available to them during periods of unemployment. The government would be able to undertake balanced-budget redistributions among the UAs, taxing the contributions of the rich and subsidizing those of the poor. When people retire, they could use their remaining UA balances to top up their pensions. Under the unemployment benefit system, people are in effect rewarded for being unemployed (through the unemployment benefits) and penalized for being employed (through the taxes that finance the unemployment benefits). The UA system alleviates these externality problems. For when an unemployed person makes withdrawals from his UA, he is thereby diminishing the amount of funds that are available to him later on.
Subjects: 
unemployment accounts
redistribution
employment
unemployment
pensions
unemployment benefits
JEL: 
J65
J23
J68
J32
J38
J64
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
1.2 MB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.