Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/27758
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChrist, Julian P.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-09-09en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-09-09T11:55:23Z-
dc.date.available2009-09-09T11:55:23Z-
dc.date.issued2009en_US
dc.identifier.piurn:nbn:de:bsz:100-opus-3368en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/27758-
dc.description.abstractDespite the increasing and newly inspired interests in geographical economics and industry location theory, the majority of existing New Economic Geography models ignores the interdependence between spatial concentration, knowledge diffusion, invention and growth. For this reason, the paper exclusively surveys the emergence and development of New Economic Geography Growth models in the context of the existing geography of innovation literature. The first part of the paper contributes with a classification of first- and second-nature causes of agglomeration and clustering. This part will also discriminate between static and dynamic externalities. Therefore, the chapter particularly compiles the differences between urbanization and localization externalities, and MAR, Jacobian and Porter externalities. A second concern of the paper is to highlight the modeling peculiarities of New Economic Geography Growth models. Besides approaching the main differences and similarities between first- and second-generation NEG models, the paper additionally reviews and discloses complemental contributions to the geography of innovation literature in the course of time. For this purpose, the paper examines in a meta-study 61 empirical contributions, which are related to the knowledge production function, the concept of spatial dependence and knowledge spillovers. The meta-study is complemented by bibliometric research. The paper ultimately concludes that the empirical studies that are related to the concept of (localized) knowledge spillovers and spatial association have caused a fundamental upgrading of the New Economic Geography literature towards non-pecuniary externalities. Consequently, the paper shows that recently developed second-generation NEG models offer alternative backward and forward linkages, which similarly determine centripetal and centrifugal forces, circular causality and finally the geography of innovation.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisher|aFZID|cStuttgarten_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aFZID discussion papers|x01-2009en_US
dc.subject.jelF12-
dc.subject.jelO31-
dc.subject.jelR11-
dc.subject.jelR12-
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordNew Economic Geography Growthen_US
dc.subject.keywordgeography of innvationen_US
dc.subject.keywordlocalized knowledge spilloversen_US
dc.subject.keyworddynamic externalitiesen_US
dc.subject.keywordcore-peripheryen_US
dc.subject.keywordspatial growthen
dc.subject.keywordknowledge production functionen
dc.subject.keywordagglomerationen
dc.subject.stwNeue ökonomische Geographieen_US
dc.subject.stwRegionale Wachstumstheorieen_US
dc.subject.stwInnovationen_US
dc.subject.stwRegionale Konzentrationen_US
dc.subject.stwWissenen_US
dc.subject.stwSpillover-Effekten_US
dc.subject.stwKern-Peripherie-Beziehungen_US
dc.titleNew Economic Geography reloaded: Localized knowledge spillovers and the geography of innovationen_US
dc.type|aWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn629628688en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen-
dc.identifier.repecRePEc:zbw:fziddp:200901-

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.