Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/277447 
Authors: 
Year of Publication: 
2019
Citation: 
[Journal:] European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention (EJEEP) [ISSN:] 2052-7772 [Volume:] 16 [Issue:] 2 [Year:] 2019 [Pages:] 226-237
Publisher: 
Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham
Abstract: 
The article provides a critical assessment of how the Economic and Monetary Union was designed, implemented and reformed in the European Union and discusses the risks of a slow-motion reform process. It is argued that the fact that the euro area economy has recovered in the last few years has become a source of complacency and delays. In particular, powerful forces continue to downplay the importance of systemic reconstruction and the risk of disintegration remains high despite the relative tranquillity of markets in the 2014–2018 period. Finally, the article evaluates competing paradigms about the eurozone crisis and the pros and cons of fiscal capacity building.
Subjects: 
European Union
Great Recession
eurozone crisis
divergence
EMUreform
fiscal capacity
JEL: 
E63
F45
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Creative Commons License: 
cc-by Logo
Document Type: 
Article

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.