Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/277290 
Year of Publication: 
2014
Citation: 
[Journal:] European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention (EJEEP) [ISSN:] 2052-7772 [Volume:] 11 [Issue:] 1 [Year:] 2014 [Pages:] 53-66
Publisher: 
Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham
Abstract: 
This paper considers from a methodological point of view why disputes in macroeconomics over its fundamental assumptions regularly occur. It analyses the problem first using Kuhn's concept of the paradigm and then draws on McCloskey's use of rhetorical analysis. It finds the latter of limited help due to the problem of incommensurability between paradigms. It concludes with a discussion of the debate over the need for rethinking the issue and rigour of micro-foundations in macroeconomic theory, notably in terms of the representative agent model.
Subjects: 
paradigm
rhetoric
representative agent model
macroeconomic methodology
JEL: 
B4
E6
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Creative Commons License: 
cc-by Logo
Document Type: 
Article

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.