Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/276223 
Year of Publication: 
1990
Citation: 
[Journal:] British Review of Economic Issues [ISSN:] 0141-4739 [Volume:] 12 [Issue:] 28 [Publisher:] Association of Polytechnic Teachers in Economics [Place:] Kingston [Year:] 1990 [Pages:] 53-65
Publisher: 
Association of Polytechnic Teachers in Economics, Kingston
Abstract: 
A macroeconomic model can depict employment only if it includes an account of the organisation of production. Keynes and many Keynesian writers have retained a neoclassical view of production, with fixed, technically efficient production functions; such a view is restrictive and neglects the social aspects of organising production. The present paper sets up a simple post-Keynesian model in which employment and productivity are allowed to be fully variable. To close the model an explicit representation of the organisation of production must be added, and the neoclassical view is only one possibility among others. Several alternatives are considered, as well as policies aimed at reorganising production. It is argued that post-Keynesian economics should rest on a non-neoclassical view of production, acknowledging the scope for variable productivity.
Subjects: 
employment
productivity
Keynesian economics
organisation of production
technical change
JEL: 
B50
E12
E23
E24
O33
Document Type: 
Article
Document Version: 
Accepted Manuscript (Postprint)
Appears in Collections:

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.