Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/27357
Authors: 
Stockhammer, Engelbert
Klär, Erik
Year of Publication: 
2008
Series/Report no.: 
DIW Discussion Papers 834
Abstract: 
According to the mainstream view, labour market institutions (LMI) are the key determinants of unemployment in the medium run. The actual empirical explanatory power of measures for labour market institutions, however, has been called into question recently (Baker et al 2005, Baccaro and Rei 2007). The Keynesian view holds periods of high real interest rates and insufficient capital accumulation responsible for unemployment (Arestis et al 2007). Empirical work in this tradition has paid little attention to role of LMI. This paper contributes to the debate by highlighting the role of autonomous changes in capital accumulation as a macroeconomic shock. In the empirical analysis, medium-term unemployment is explained by capital accumulation, labour market institutions and a number of macroeconomic shocks in a panel analysis covering 20 OECD countries. The economic effects of institutional changes, variations in capital accumulation and other macro shocks are compared. Capital accumulation and the real interest rate are found to have statistically significant effects that are robust to the inclusion of control variables and show larger effects than LMI.
Subjects: 
Unemployment
NAIRU
capital accumulation
labour market institutions
Keynesian economics
JEL: 
E12
E20
E24
E60
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
448.06 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.