Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/271209 
Autor:innen: 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2023
Quellenangabe: 
[Journal:] Geography Compass [ISSN:] 1749-8198 [Volume:] 17 [Issue:] 5 [Article No.:] e12688 [Publisher:] Wiley [Place:] Hoboken, NJ [Year:] 2023 [Pages:] 1-16
Verlag: 
Wiley, Hoboken, NJ
Zusammenfassung: 
Geographers and urban studies scholars tend to rely on policy mobilities approaches to explain processes of policy spread, whereas political scientists and public policy scholars usually draw on either policy diffusion or policy transfer. I challenge this widespread scholarly practice of selecting approaches based on the association with a certain discipline. Instead, first and foremost, the specific research aim(s) and question(s) should shape the choice of theoretical lens. Analytical or policy outcome-oriented studies should rely on policy diffusion and policy transfer, while a policy mobilities approach is best suited for more (policy) critical analysis. The approaches can also complement each other to a certain degree. Analytical and policy outcome-oriented approaches need a stronger critical perspective while policy mobilities scholars need to underpin their critique with constructive suggestions on how to improve established practices.
Schlagwörter: 
critical studies
policy diffusion
policy innovations
policy outcome-oriented studies
policy spread
policy transfer
urban policy mobilities
Persistent Identifier der Erstveröffentlichung: 
Creative-Commons-Lizenz: 
cc-by-nc-nd Logo
Dokumentart: 
Article
Dokumentversion: 
Published Version

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.