Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/269931 
Year of Publication: 
2020
Citation: 
[Journal:] Cogent Economics & Finance [ISSN:] 2332-2039 [Volume:] 8 [Issue:] 1 [Article No.:] 1782073 [Year:] 2020 [Pages:] 1-25
Publisher: 
Taylor & Francis, Abingdon
Abstract: 
This study examines signaling, excess cash flow, substitution, leverage, agency cost, stock and liquidity hypotheses by considering firm-specific parameters to find out their impact on selection between tender offer and open market method while doing buyback. This study is based on the basic premise that the rules and regulations those govern these two methods are completely different and have different objectives. This study takes 430 non-financial buybacks from 1998-1999 to 2017-2018 for analysis and these buybacks segregated in terms of tender offer (176) and open market methods (254). In this study, both univariate and multivariate tests have been employed. T-test and Wilcoxon rank sum test are used for univariate analysis, and logistic regression is used for multivariate analysis. The empirical findings corroborate the evidence that free cash flow hypothesis, leverage hypothesis, agency cost hypothesis and liquidity hypothesis are the prime motivators for choosing of tender offer than open market share repurchase. This study finds that dividend paid and choosing of tender offer are substitutes. The results also support the notion that for correcting short-term undervaluation firms choose tender offer rather than open market methods. This study is the first comprehensive analysis in the Indian context to find out the motivations behind the selection of share repurchase methods.
Subjects: 
determinants
Indian buyback
open market method
Tender offer
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Creative Commons License: 
cc-by Logo
Document Type: 
Article

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.