Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/26935
Authors: 
Nicklisch, Andreas
Year of Publication: 
2007
Series/Report no.: 
Preprints of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods 2007,21
Abstract: 
This article discusses the limitations of the orthodox economic theory of the firm as a nexus of contracts. Various experimental studies have shown that the aggregation of individuals in groups changes behavior and preferences systematically. This perspective has been formalized by models of interdependent preferences. Based on a prominent approach of interdependent preferences, intention-based preferences, two types of labor contracts, incentive contracts and bonus contracts, are analyzed. Results are compared with the predictions of the orthodox economic theory.
Subjects: 
Firms
interdependent preferences
labor contracts
JEL: 
D21
D63
L14
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
326.12 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.