Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/268440 
Authors: 
Year of Publication: 
2020
Citation: 
[Journal:] Business Ethics Journal Review [ISSN:] 2326-7526 [Volume:] 8 [Issue:] 5 [Publisher:] The Journal Review Foundation of the Americas [Place:] Canada [Year:] 2020 [Pages:] 26-30
Publisher: 
The Journal Review Foundation of the Americas, Canada
Abstract: 
Mensch and Barge in their interpretation of Alasdair MacIntyre’s critique of genealogical ethics as a basis of ethical weakness in the emerging field of “leadership-as-practice,” suggest that L-A-P is lacking in ethical grounding especially because of its relativist philosophy. I address this valid ethical concern in L-A-P theory by arguing that there is a form of realism in Nietzchean axiology and that the dialogic potentialities in material-social interactions may offer a greater capacity for ethical reflexivity than a reliance on rules.
Subjects: 
Leadership-as-Practice
Nietzschean ethics
Phenomenology
Critical dialogue
JEL: 
J24
M10
M12
M14
D63
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Document Type: 
Article
Document Version: 
Published Version
Appears in Collections:

Files in This Item:
File
Size
106.7 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.