Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/26805
Authors: 
Frondel, Manuel
Ritter, Nolan
Schmidt, Christoph M.
Year of Publication: 
2008
Series/Report no.: 
Ruhr economic papers 40
Abstract: 
This article demonstrates that the large feed-in tariffs currently guaranteed for solar electricity in Germany constitute a subsidization regime that, if extended to 2020, threatens to reach a level comparable to that of German hard coal production, a notoriously outstanding example of misguided political intervention. Yet, as a consequence of the coexistence of the German Renewable Energy Sources Act (EEG) and the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS), the increased use of renewable energy technologies does not imply any additional emission reductions beyond those already achieved by ETS alone. Similarly disappointing is the net employment balance, which is likely to be negative if one takes into account the opportunity cost of this form of solar photovoltaic support. Along the lines of the International Energy Agency (IEA 2007:77), we therefore recommend the immediate and drastic reduction of the magnitude of the feed-in tariffs granted for solar-based electricity. Ultimately, producing electricity on this basis is among the most expensive greenhouse gas abatement options.
Subjects: 
Energy policy
energy security
learning effects
JEL: 
Q28
Q42
Q48
ISBN: 
978-3-86788-038-1
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
147.33 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.