Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/265075 
Autor:innen: 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2022
Quellenangabe: 
[Journal:] The Journal of World Intellectual Property [ISSN:] 1747-1796 [Volume:] 25 [Issue:] 2 [Publisher:] Wiley [Place:] Hoboken, NJ [Year:] 2022 [Pages:] 536-555
Verlag: 
Wiley, Hoboken, NJ
Zusammenfassung: 
The essay argues that anti‐suit injunctions granted in disputes on standard‐essential patents are inconsistent with the general standards governing anti‐suit injunctions. The section on anti‐suit injunction demonstrates that the case law on anti‐suit injunctions is not comparable to disputes over standard essential patents. In contrast, anti‐anti‐suit injunctions are a legitimate response to an extraterritorial assertion of jurisdiction by foreign courts. Under EU law, the courts of member states might even be required to issue anti‐anti‐suit injunctions to protect their exclusive jurisdiction over patents.
Schlagwörter: 
anti‐anti‐suit injunctions
anti‐suit injunctions
FRAND
litigation
SEP
standards
telecommunications
Persistent Identifier der Erstveröffentlichung: 
Creative-Commons-Lizenz: 
cc-by Logo
Dokumentart: 
Article
Dokumentversion: 
Published Version

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
811.24 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.