Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/265075 
Authors: 
Year of Publication: 
2022
Citation: 
[Journal:] The Journal of World Intellectual Property [ISSN:] 1747-1796 [Volume:] 25 [Issue:] 2 [Publisher:] Wiley [Place:] Hoboken, NJ [Year:] 2022 [Pages:] 536-555
Publisher: 
Wiley, Hoboken, NJ
Abstract: 
The essay argues that anti‐suit injunctions granted in disputes on standard‐essential patents are inconsistent with the general standards governing anti‐suit injunctions. The section on anti‐suit injunction demonstrates that the case law on anti‐suit injunctions is not comparable to disputes over standard essential patents. In contrast, anti‐anti‐suit injunctions are a legitimate response to an extraterritorial assertion of jurisdiction by foreign courts. Under EU law, the courts of member states might even be required to issue anti‐anti‐suit injunctions to protect their exclusive jurisdiction over patents.
Subjects: 
anti‐anti‐suit injunctions
anti‐suit injunctions
FRAND
litigation
SEP
standards
telecommunications
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Creative Commons License: 
cc-by Logo
Document Type: 
Article
Document Version: 
Published Version

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.