Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/26462
Authors: 
Bosetti, Valentina
Carraro, Carlo
Sgobbi, Alessandra
Tavoni, Massimo
Year of Publication: 
2008
Series/Report no.: 
CESifo working paper 2417
Abstract: 
This paper provides a quantitative comparison of the main architectures for an agreement on climate policy. Possible successors to the Kyoto protocol are assessed according to four criteria: economic efficiency; environmental effectiveness; distributional implications; and their political acceptability which is measured in terms of feasibility and enforceability. The ultimate aim is to derive useful information for designing a future agreement on climate change control.
Subjects: 
Climate policy
integrated modelling
international agreements
JEL: 
C72
H23
Q25
Q28
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
277.4 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.