Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/26368
Authors: 
Glazer, Amihai
Kanniainen, Vesa
Poutvaara, Panu
Year of Publication: 
2008
Series/Report no.: 
CESifo working paper 2323
Abstract: 
This paper develops a theory of consumer boycotts. Some consumers care not only about the products they buy but also about whether the firm behaves ethically. Other consumers do not care about the behavior of the firm but yet may like to give the impression of being ethical consumers. Consequently, to affect a firm's ethical behavior, moral consumers refuse to buy from an unethical firm. Consumers who do not care about ethical behavior may join the boycott to (falsely) signal that they do care. In the firms' choice between ethical and unethical behavior, the optimality of mixed and pure strategies depends on the cost of behaving ethically. In particular, when the cost is (relatively) low, ethical behavior arises from a prisoners' dilemma as the firms' optimal strategy.
Subjects: 
Firms' ethical code
consumer morality
boycotts
JEL: 
M14
D43
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
174.98 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.