Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/26367
Autoren: 
Apps, Patricia
Rees, Ray
Datum: 
2008
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
CESifo Working Paper No. 2322
Zusammenfassung: 
In a careful and thorough empirical study, Christopher Udry (1996) shows convincingly that, in a large sample of West African households, household resource allocations were not Pareto efficient. This paper argues that observation of the Pareto inefficiency of a household resource allocation does not however refute the hypothesis that it chooses this resource allocation as if it maximises some form of household welfare function possessing the Pareto property. To refute that hypothesis it is necessary to show that the observed allocation does not represent a second best optimum. For this it will be necessary to show that the estimated parameters of the model lie in a region of the parameter space for which the second best optimality of the allocation does not hold.
Schlagwörter: 
empirical test
Pareto efficiency
household welfare
JEL: 
D12
D13
D70
J16
J22
O12
Q12
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
158.08 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.