Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/263608 
Year of Publication: 
2022
Series/Report no.: 
IZA Discussion Papers No. 15392
Publisher: 
Institute of Labor Economics (IZA), Bonn
Abstract: 
We study the factors that predict medical malpractice ("med mal") insurance premia, using national data from Medical Liability Monitor over 1990 to 2017. A number of core findings are not easily explained by standard economic theory. First, we estimate long run elasticities of premia to insurers' direct cost (payouts plus defense costs), allowing for lags of up to four years, of only around +0.40, when one might expect elasticities near one. Second, state caps on malpractice damages predict a roughly 50% higher ratio of premia to direct costs even though, in competitive markets, a damages cap should affect premia primarily through effect on cost. A difference-in-differences analysis of the "new cap" states that adopted caps during the early 2000's provides evidence supporting a causal link between cap adoption and the ratio of premium to direct cost. Third, the premium-to-cost ratio, which one might expect to be fairly constant over time, instead varies widely both across states at a given time and within states across time. Our results suggest that insurance companies do not fully adjust revenues to changes in direct costs even over long time periods. Insurers in new-cap states have been able to charge apparently supra-competitive prices for a sustained period.
Subjects: 
insurance premium
medical malpractice
physicians
JEL: 
D22
G22
K13
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
1.24 MB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.