Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/263457 
Year of Publication: 
2022
Series/Report no.: 
IZA Discussion Papers No. 15241
Publisher: 
Institute of Labor Economics (IZA), Bonn
Abstract: 
In this paper we study the finite sample and asymptotic properties of various weighting estimators of the local average treatment effect (LATE), several of which are based on Abadie (2003)'s kappa theorem. Our framework presumes a binary endogenous explanatory variable ("treatment") and a binary instrumental variable, which may only be valid after conditioning on additional covariates. We argue that one of the Abadie estimators, which we show is weight normalized, is likely to dominate the others in many contexts. A notable exception is in settings with one-sided noncompliance, where certain unnormalized estimators have the advantage of being based on a denominator that is bounded away from zero. We use a simulation study and three empirical applications to illustrate our findings. In applications to causal effects of college education using the college proximity instrument (Card, 1995) and causal effects of childbearing using the sibling sex composition instrument (Angrist and Evans, 1998), the unnormalized estimates are clearly unreasonable, with "incorrect" signs, magnitudes, or both. Overall, our results suggest that (i) the relative performance of different kappa weighting estimators varies with features of the data-generating process; and that (ii) the normalized version of Tan (2006)'s estimator may be an attractive alternative in many contexts. Applied researchers with access to a binary instrumental variable should also consider covariate balancing or doubly robust estimators of the LATE.
Subjects: 
instrumental variables
local average treatment effects
one-sided noncompliance
weighting
JEL: 
C21
C26
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
3.34 MB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.