Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/262720 
Year of Publication: 
2022
Series/Report no.: 
New Working Paper Series No. 318
Publisher: 
University of Chicago Booth School of Business, Stigler Center for the Study of the Economy and the State, Chicago, IL
Abstract: 
Do investors correctly price extreme events that they have never seen occur? To shed light on this question, I examine market responses to the risk of nuclear war during the Cuban Missile Crisis. I find evidence that investors indeed priced firms' exposures to nuclear destruction: Firms headquartered in areas that American national-security experts and the general public perceived more at risk of nuclear destruction experienced lower returns. Such discrimination is plausible given contemporary survey evidence that investors generally believed that the US could recover from a nuclear war. Employing a calibrated model to reconcile survey expectations with aggregate market responses, I find that i.) Investors underreacted to the risk of nuclear war; ii.) Investors exhibited a lower level of risk aversion than is standard in the literature; or iii.) Investor heterogeneity or noise makes survey data inaccurate indicators of investors' perceived exposures to extreme risks.
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
3.09 MB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.