Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/260987 
Autor:innen: 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2022
Quellenangabe: 
[Journal:] Journal of Innovation & Knowledge (JIK) [ISSN:] 2444-569X [Volume:] 7 [Issue:] 2 [Article No.:] 100172 [Publisher:] Elsevier [Place:] Amsterdam [Year:] 2022 [Pages:] 1-8
Verlag: 
Elsevier, Amsterdam
Zusammenfassung: 
Here, we use an input distance function approach to determine the shadow price of carbon dioxide (CO2), technical efficiency and potential for emission reductions of the industrial sectors of China and Korea, and impact of carbon trading on costs. Data from 20 industries in the manufacturing sectors of South Korea and China were analyzed during 2015-2019. The potential for CO2 emission reductions and cost-saving effects of emissions trading were compared between the two countries. The average technical efficiency score of 20 manufacturing industries in Korea was 0.71, indicating that production costs could be reduced by almost 30%, while for China, the potential cost savings were 4% higher. The average marginal abatement cost in Korea was estimated as US$6.46/ton, while the weighted average marginal abatement cost for CO2 emissions (ps), was US$15.1/ton. For China, the respective values were similar, at US$3.21/ton and US$6.57/ton.
Schlagwörter: 
Carbon emissions trading
CO shadow price
Environmental capacities
Input distance function
Manufacturing industry
Technical efficiency
Persistent Identifier der Erstveröffentlichung: 
Creative-Commons-Lizenz: 
cc-by-nc-nd Logo
Dokumentart: 
Article

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
523.74 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.