Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/260446 
Year of Publication: 
2017
Series/Report no.: 
WiSo-HH Working Paper Series No. 43
Publisher: 
Universität Hamburg, Fakultät für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften, WiSo-Forschungslabor, Hamburg
Abstract: 
We provide empirical evidence that intra-personal changes in life-satisfaction are a biased measure of preference rankings and, as a remedy, propose the ranking measure where subjects state whether their life has become "better" or "worse". Three representative datasets reveal: intra-personal changes in satisfaction levels are dominated by noise and less well explained by socio-economic variables than the ranking measure; the deviation between the two measures is systematic and adaptation (e.g. to income and unemployment) is only observed for changes in satisfaction levels but not for rankings, indicating that adaptation is driven by the elicitation method rather than changes in preferences.
Subjects: 
Life satisfaction
preference rankings
adaptation
JEL: 
I31
C83
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
738.96 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.