Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/260044 
Year of Publication: 
2012
Series/Report no.: 
Working Paper No. 2012:19
Publisher: 
Lund University, School of Economics and Management, Department of Economics, Lund
Abstract: 
Body-mass index (BMI), sometimes calculated from objectively measured and sometimes from self-reported weight and height, has become the standard proxy for obesity in social science research. This study deals with the potential problems related to, first, relying on self-reported weight and height to calculate BMI (misreporting), and, second, the concern that BMI is a deficient measure of body fat and elevated health risks (misclassification). Using a regional Swedish sample, we analyze whether socioeconomic disparities in BMI are biased because of misreporting, and whether socioeconomic disparities in the risk of obesity are sensitive to whether BMI or waist circumference is used to define obesity. Education and two income measures are used as socioeconomic indicators. Among women, different educational groups misreport differently, leading to underestimation of the education disparity when using self-reported information. Among men, misreporting is un-related to socioeconomic status, but misclassification is related to education. As a consequence, when estimating the risk of obesity defined using waist circumference, an educational gradient, which is not present when classifying men using BMI, arises. Taken together, female disparities appear more sensitive to whether weight and height are self-reported, whereas male disparities are more sensitive to definition of obesity.
Subjects: 
body-mass index
waist circumference
obesity
socioeconomic disparity
misreporting
misclassification
JEL: 
I12
I14
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.