Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/257981 
Year of Publication: 
2020
Citation: 
[Journal:] Risks [ISSN:] 2227-9091 [Volume:] 8 [Issue:] 1 [Article No.:] 26 [Publisher:] MDPI [Place:] Basel [Year:] 2020 [Pages:] 1-32
Publisher: 
MDPI, Basel
Abstract: 
We examine the lead-lag effect between the large and the small capitalization financial institutions by constructing two global weekly rebalanced indices. We focus on the 10% of stocks that "survived" all the rebalancings by remaining constituents of the indices. We sort them according to their systemic importance using the marginal expected shortfall (MES), which measures the individual institutions' vulnerability over the market, the network based MES, which captures the vulnerability of the risks generated by institutions' interrelations, and the Bayesian network based MES, which takes into account different network structures among institutions' interrelations. We also check if the lead-lag effect holds in terms of systemic risk implying systemic risk transmission from the large to the small capitalization, concluding a mixed behavior compared to the index returns. Additionally, we find that all the systemic risk indicators increase their magnitude during the financial crisis.
Subjects: 
financial networks
lead-lag effect
systemic risk
VAR
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Creative Commons License: 
cc-by Logo
Document Type: 
Article
Appears in Collections:

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.