Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/256814 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2021
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
NBB Working Paper No. 403
Verlag: 
National Bank of Belgium, Brussels
Zusammenfassung: 
This discussion paper investigates the differences existing between the Single Point of Entry and the Multiple Point of Entry resolution models and links this question to the issue of support that bank subsidiaries can expect from their parent companies both in resolution and in normal insolvency proceedings. Given that parental support remains imperfect in these two resolution models, the paper concludes that existing safeguards aiming at preserving the corporate interests of subsidiaries remain needed and justified. The paper then identifies potential avenues that could be further explored to reinforce the support model and thereby reduce incentives to adopt ring-fencing measures.
Schlagwörter: 
Bank resolution
SPE
Banking crisis
bail-in
bankruptcy
JEL: 
G10
G21
G28
K22
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
242.09 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.