Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/255972 
Authors: 
Year of Publication: 
2005
Series/Report no.: 
SWP Comments No. 39/2005
Publisher: 
Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik (SWP), Berlin
Abstract: 
Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak's reelection on 7 September 2005 came as absolutely no surprise. The only open question was exactly how the vote would split between the president and his strongest opponent, populist liberal opposition leader Ayman Nour. The comfortable official result of 88.6 percent for Mubarak, 7.6 percent for Nour, and not even four percent for the other eight candidates together will allow Mubarak, who is seventy-seven years old and has held the office of president since the assassination of Anwar Sadat in 1981, to govern for another six years - assuming his health holds up. The important point, however, is not the result itself, but the mere fact that for the first time an Egyptian president has been chosen in a contest involving more than one candidate, rather than by referendum. This remains true even though the conditions were so arranged that Mubarak's rivals stood no chance of winning. The election brings about gradual change in the political system by introducing the principle of democ-ratic competition for the office of the supreme decisionmaker for the first time, but the real political effect of this development will not be felt until the Hosni Mubarak era is over.(SWP Comments / SWP)
Document Type: 
Research Report

Files in This Item:
File
Size
54.22 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.