Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/253969 
Year of Publication: 
2014
Series/Report no.: 
Columbia FDI Perspectives No. 135
Publisher: 
Columbia University, Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment (CCSI), New York, NY
Abstract: 
The exclusion of investor-state arbitration from the TTIP agreement would represent a regressive development in international investment law that is to be resisted rather than furthered. The key contentions advanced by critics of investor-state arbitration are exaggerated, and reform efforts should instead focus on its shortcomings.
Document Type: 
Research Report

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.