Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/252209 
Year of Publication: 
2022
Series/Report no.: 
IZA Discussion Papers No. 15085
Publisher: 
Institute of Labor Economics (IZA), Bonn
Abstract: 
We capitalise on an opportunity in the UK Household Longitudinal Study, which asks respondents the same SAH question with identical wording two times. This is done once with a self-completion and once with an open interview mode within the same household interview over four waves. We estimate multivariate models to explore which individual and household-level characteristics are systematically relevant for the likelihood and frequency of inconsistent reporting across the two modes. We find evidence of some inconsistency in reporting; 11%-24% of those who reported a particular SAH category in the self-completion mode reported inconsistently in the open interview. The probability of inconsistency is systematic and influenced by an individual's demographics, education, income, employment status, cognitive and non-cognitive skills. The same characteristics are also systematically associated with the frequency of inconsistent reporting across four UKHLS waves. Analysis of the implications of reporting inconsistencies shows no impact of SAH measurement on the magnitude of the association between income and health, estimated separately using the two SAH measures. A set of dimensions of people's physiological and biological health, captured using biomarkers, is associated equally with both SAH measures, suggesting that reporting inconsistencies in SAH may be driven by mechanisms other than people's underlying health.
Subjects: 
measurement error
reporting bias
self-assessed health
UKHLS
JEL: 
C10
C33
C83
I10
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
755.54 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.