Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/251033 
Year of Publication: 
2022
Series/Report no.: 
Bank of Canada Staff Discussion Paper No. 2022-3
Publisher: 
Bank of Canada, Ottawa
Abstract: 
A new wholesale payments system will launch in Canada in 2021. This real-time gross settlement system called Lynx will have two types of settlement mechanisms, one allowing offsetting and the other not. This paper studies the decision problem of the Bank of Canada: which of the two settlement mechanisms should it use to send its payments. Using extensive simulation, we show that, mainly due to the benefits of liquidity pooling, Lynx would achieve its highest liquidity efficiency - even better than that of the current Large Value Transfer System (LVTS) - if all payments (urgent and non-urgent) from all participants were sent to the mechanism allowing offsetting. The minimum amount of liquidity required to settle all payments by critical deadlines is approximately $10 billion, around half the amount of collateral that LVTS participants allocate (pre-COVID-19). Since time-critical payments sent to the offsetting mechanism could experience a delay, the high level of liquidity efficiency is accompanied by an increase in the number of participants' operational interventions (to pledge more collateral or to alter payment priorities) to ensure that those time-critical payments are never delayed. When coordination does not occur, liquidity efficiency can be far lower than in the LVTS. The results highlight that the Bank of Canada helping with coordination is more important than the specific choice of mechanism.
Subjects: 
Payment
clearing and settlement systems
JEL: 
C
C5
E42
E58
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
542.74 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.