Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/24881 
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKhalilian, Setarehen
dc.date.accessioned2009-03-11-
dc.date.accessioned2009-04-09T07:48:34Z-
dc.date.available2009-04-09T07:48:34Z-
dc.date.issued2009-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/24881-
dc.description.abstractThe current WTO jurisdiction on linkages of trade and environment is not free of contradictions and has provided for heated debate due to some inconsistencies in past WTO rulings. The article argues that the WTO jurisdiction is not only unclear but also lacks economic reasoning. It aims to structure WTO provisions and WTO case rulings so that their application to three separate dimensions of environmental damage is set out clearly: domestic, cross-border and global pollution. The paper concludes is that only cases of cross-border and global pollution can legitimize trade measures against environmental pollution, albeit only direct trade interventions are really effective in these cases.en
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisher|aKiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW) |cKielen
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aKiel Working Paper |x1485en
dc.subject.jelF13en
dc.subject.jelF18en
dc.subject.jelK33en
dc.subject.jelB52en
dc.subject.ddc330en
dc.subject.keywordWTOen
dc.subject.keywordenvironmenten
dc.subject.keywordtrade sanctionsen
dc.subject.stwWTO-Regelnen
dc.subject.stwUmweltschutzen
dc.subject.stwGrenzüberschreitende Umweltbelastungen
dc.subject.stwSanktionen
dc.subject.stwWelten
dc.titleThe WTO and environmental provisions: three categories of trade and environment linkage-
dc.typeWorking Paperen
dc.identifier.ppn593507894en
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen
dc.identifier.repecRePEc:zbw:ifwkwp:1485en

Files in This Item:
File
Size
228.88 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.