Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/247189 
Autor:innen: 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2021
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
Working Paper No. 920
Verlag: 
Queen Mary University of London, School of Economics and Finance, London
Zusammenfassung: 
The analysis in Galperti and Strulovici (2017) relies on two axioms that appear normatively and descriptively very appealing. Notably, these two axioms, taken together with some standard axioms, imply a failure of dynamic consistency. The current comment argues that the two axioms are less normatively and descriptively appealing than they seem. Thus, the challenge to dynamic consistency posed by Galperti and Strulovici is less convincing than it first appears.
Schlagwörter: 
intergenerational choice
intertemporal choice
dynamic consistency
JEL: 
D01
D60
D64
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
300.37 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.