Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/24518 
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAerts, Krisen
dc.contributor.authorSchmidt, Tobiasen
dc.date.accessioned2009-02-16T14:57:01Z-
dc.date.available2009-02-16T14:57:01Z-
dc.date.issued2006-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/24518-
dc.description.abstractIn this paper we empirically test whether public R&D subsidies crowd out private R&D investment in Flanders and Germany, using firm level data from the Flemish and German part of the Community Innovation survey (CIS III and IV). Both the non-parametric matching estimator and the conditional difference-in-difference estimator with repeated cross-sections (CDiDRCS) clearly indicate that the crowding-out hypothesis can be rejected: funded firms are significantly more R&D active than non-funded firms. In the domain of additionality effects of R&D subsidies, this paper is the first to apply the CDiDRCS method.en
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisher|aZentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung (ZEW) |cMannheimen
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aZEW Discussion Papers |x06-063en
dc.subject.jelO38en
dc.subject.jelH50en
dc.subject.jelC21en
dc.subject.jelC14en
dc.subject.ddc330en
dc.subject.keywordR&Den
dc.subject.keywordSubsidiesen
dc.subject.keywordPolicy Evaluationen
dc.subject.keywordConditional Difference-in-Differenceen
dc.titleTwo for the price of one? On additionality effects of R&D subsidies: A comparison between Flanders and Germany-
dc.typeWorking Paperen
dc.identifier.ppn517627531en
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen
dc.identifier.repecRePEc:zbw:zewdip:5457en

Files in This Item:
File
Size
622.13 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.