Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: 
Year of Publication: 
Series/Report no.: 
ZEW Discussion Papers No. 01-65
Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung (ZEW), Mannheim
The allocation of emissions entitlements across countries is the single most controversial issue in international climate policy. Extreme positions within the policy debate range from entitlement based on current emission patterns (CEP) to equal-per-capita (EPC) allocations.Convergence (COV) from an initial CEP allocation towards EPC emission rights represents a reconciliation of the two. This paper maintains that the acceptability of alternative entitlement schemes depends on their implications for economic welfare and uses a dynamic multi-region general equilibrium model for a comparative economic assessment of the above allocation rules. We find welfare implications for the varius regions to be strongly influenced by changes in the terms of trade. Especially, regions may experience considerable welfare losses even under entitlement schemes which impose no binding emission constraint on them. Among the arrangements examined, COV cum emissions trading stands out for offering the developing countries substantial incentives for paticipation in the international greenhouse gas abatement effort without imposing excessive burdens on the industrialized countries.
climate policy
economic welfare
international equity
emissions trading
computable general equilibrium modeling
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
207.88 kB

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.