Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/244492 
Year of Publication: 
2013
Series/Report no.: 
Working Paper No. 4/2013
Publisher: 
Örebro University School of Business, Örebro
Abstract: 
Perceived health, mood, job demands and social support are common outcome variables in epidemiological studies of the psychosocial work environment, as measured by multidimensional multiitem questionnaires. The Stress-Energy Questionnaire (SEQ) is one such questionnaire and was developed to measure two critical aspects of mood at work. When a variable is measured by more than one item, the construction of a global score for that particular variable is often necessary. The most common way of aggregating items into a total or global score is to sum or average the responses, which requires equidistance scale categories and all items to be equally important. Assessments on many questionnaires, including the SEQ, are made on rating scales, meaning that the data consist of ordered categories irrespective of the type of coding system. These codes do not represent numerical values, but rather only convenient labelling devices for ordering responses from the lowest to the highest amount of the characteristic being measured. They do not have the mathematical properties needed for arithmetic calculations. In this study, different approaches for the construction of global scores are discussed. We have showed that there are alternative methods for the construction of global scores that take into account the nonmetric properties of data from questionnaires. The median and the criterion based approaches are proposed as the appropriate methods to use for ordinal data and these were applied to the empirical dataset.
Subjects: 
global scores
ordinal data
questionnaires
rating scales
JEL: 
A10
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
210.43 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.