Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/244454 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2010
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
Working Paper No. 14/2009
Verlag: 
Örebro University School of Business, Örebro
Zusammenfassung: 
We present results from a series of willingness to-accept value-of-time choice experiments with students in Sweden and China, using both real and hypothetical purchases of the students´ time. Our results confirm negative hypothetical bias in stated choice elicitation of value-of-time. However, we find no evidence of hypothetical bias in a choice experiment where respondents to hypothetical or real offers have equal reference points (i.e., for purchase of their time "here and now"). Moreover, at least in the Chinese sample, we find that ex-post mitigation of negative hypothetical bias by certainty calibration, through recoding of uncertain "yes" responses into "no", overshoots, while calibration by restricting estimations to confident "yes" and "no" responses possibly performs better.
Schlagwörter: 
Stated choice
Certainty calibration
Preference certainty
JEL: 
C20
C91
D80
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
668.23 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.